On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:26:42 -0500, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've already opened a problem with CA on this. But I thought that I'd >ask here, just in case. > >We are using CA-MIM/Integrity 11.5 SP1. Communications is CTCDASD. This >is on our two system basic sysplex. We also use GRS for some/most global >ENQs. MIM on one system abended with a U0095 REASON=5B9, with the >message: > >*MIM0095E MIMIT MSIERROR CODE=1465 issued by MIMEQFIN.MIMEQGQF+0140 >QEL not found > >Anybody seen anything like this before? MIMIT is running in a high WLM >service class. Should it be in SYSSTC? > Why MII and GRS doing ENQs? MII (and MIC) should run in SYSTEM. If you share MIA in the same address space it can come along for the ride. See the MIM documentation on using the MIMASC PROC which executes a program that uses ASCRE to start the MIM ASID. FYI... we run MII and MIC in one address space, MIA in another. Some LPARs (monoplex) run MIA only. MIA runs in SYSSTC on all LPARs that use it. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
