<snip> Can SYS1.STGINDEX (VIO journaling) have secondary allocations? </snip> AFAIK, No.
BTW Why are you still doing VIO at all? It made a lot of sense when disk access times were 17-30 ms, but not with 3-4ms (Escon/Cache) or < 1 ms (FICON/Cache) When I found that we were doing a CLPA at every IPL(which clears all data related to VIO from prior to the IPL), I disabled VIO journaling VIODSN=IGNORE and deleted SYS1.STGINDEX. HTH, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
