On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:28:39 -0400, Mark Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>Shane Ginnane wrote:
>> Quoting Mark Zelden:
>>
>>
>>> Why not migrate them directly to ML2 with HSM?  That is what we do.
>>> They are only on DASD for a short time.
>>>
>>
>> We use MPF to kick off a task to extract the dump summary and create an
>> ISPF table I use to manage the dumps. The dump itself is flicked to ML2
>> - on virtual tapes these days, so I can get them back in next to no time
>> in need.
>> They stay there till I decide otherwise - I prefer to have too many than
>> delete one I might need later on. My (manual) purge window is around the
>> 3 month mark (picked out of the air, no science involved).
>>
>> Shane ...
>>
>>
>
>We also use the dynamic dump allocation process and send them to our TMM
>pool where they sit for three days, HSM then migrates them to tape where
>they automatically expire in six months, a date I also picked out the air.
>
>--

I just looked at dump the MGMTCLAS and ours is set for 30 days.   I can't 
imagine needing a dump 6 months after it happened, but tape is cheap.  

How old is the oldest dump you recall having to go back to?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to