On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:58:31 +1000, Shane Ginnane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Jim, is it safe to assume SCCBSAIX is always valid ???. Has agreed with >SCCBSAI on the couple of systems I looked at. > >Maybe Mark Z could add a couple of lines to IPLINFO (if not already there; >been a while since I pulled a new version). > >Shane ... > >> However, if you use SYS1.MACLIB(IHASCCB) to >> map the area pointed to by CVTSCPIN (CVT+340), then >> SCCBSAI (or if it is zero, use SCCBSAIX) allows you to compute >> the increment size. > Not there. I'll look at doing it... seems simple enough. I wonder what it will look like on a FLEX/ES machine. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
