In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/04/2008
at 07:04 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Well, as unaccustomed to hearing me praise MVS as readers of this list
>are, I have free choice between MVS and CMS. I rarely touch CMS:
While I refer to CMS as Clumsy Monitor System, I've wanted a TSO/ISPF
version of XEDIT for decades.
>o CMS multiprocessing capabilities are dismal. It's even
> harder to do 2 or more things at once with CMS than with z/OS.
Hasn't that been available for lo these many releases?
>Does Object Rexx run under CMS?
I didn't read that as referring to CMS, and I agree that OREXX for TSO is
long overdue. But I also agree that OREXX for CMS is long overdue. ;-)
>As for the garlic remarks about larger screens: Yah, but I
>want 2 or more screens.
You already have 4 screens,or more if you use WSA. ITYM that you want ISPF
to run them in parallel.
>I suspect that as soon as your initiates see that this can't be done,
They're hallucinating, because it can be done. Unfortunately, it's clumsy.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
