On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:47:52 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>You would think it would have failed for a JCL error but it did not. > >>But it brings to question what happens in this case? >Did it invailidate >>that line and not use it? > >>Inquiring minds want to know. > >One blank after JCL statements, and all the text afterwards is a comment (JCL101). > I forgot to mention and was hoping that my cut and paste would illustrate it, but the numbers that were moved were from columns 68-75. Thanks for the lesson, but that doesn't help explain the odd behavior. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
