On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:54:15 -0500, Patrick Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:47:52 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >>>You would think it would have failed for a JCL error but it did not. >> >>>But it brings to question what happens in this case? >Did it invailidate that >line and not use it? >> >>>Inquiring minds want to know. >> >>One blank after JCL statements, and all the text afterwards is a comment >(JCL101). >> > > > >I forgot to mention and was hoping that my cut and paste would illustrate it, >but the numbers that were moved were from columns 68-75. > I couldn't tell exactly how far from the post, but it was obvious to me what you meant when you wrote "the numbers that should be in columns 72-80 were pulled to the left". Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
