>But I do think calling it "significant" would be stretch for people still using >the default / sample MAXVIRT
Perhaps you're alluding to the fact that the default MAXVIRT of 16M is "archaically" small, as in "how much module stuff can you cache in 16M anyway...". Of course what is "significant" to some might not be to others. Certainly "noticeable" (at least if you're looking). >Is this the whole cache that gets invalidated on refresh? Or just >the library / libraries specified? And does specifying specific libraries >make sense? This is the difference between "refresh" (F LLA,REFRESH) and "update" (referencing a CSVLLAxx parmlib member which identifies the library/libraries to be updated). Think of refresh as "update all libraries" and think of "update a library" as "invalidate anything related to that library and start over". So if you're only changing one library, then doing an LLA refresh is serious overkill. That is why references were made to using CSVLLAxx (sort of a "targeted update") as opposed to refresh (the sledgehammer approach). Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
