IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote on 10/04/2008 01:14:01 PM:
> Dave, > > Storage Release gets rid of the cell pool, but aesthetically, I > would do a cell pool delete, followed by the Storage Release for the > other storage. > > Tom > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Sat Oct 04 12:07:01 2008 > Subject: CPOOL Delete vs. STORAGE RELEASE using SP= > > > If I build a cell pool in subpool #1, does a STORAGE RELEASE > specifying only SP=1 get rid of the cell pool as well as all other > allocated storage in sub pool #1, or do I have to CPOOL DELETE the > cell pool as well? You should do a CPOOL DELETE. The release of SP 1 would free the PXT and the cell storage for any primary and secondary extents, but it would not free the PPD or any SPDs, which are located in LSQA. Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
