Jim,
Thanks. That's what the code currently does now, a CPOOL DELETE. I'll
leave it as is.
--Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: CPOOL Delete vs. STORAGE RELEASE using SP=
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote on 10/04/2008
01:14:01 PM:
Dave,
Storage Release gets rid of the cell pool, but aesthetically, I
would do a cell pool delete, followed by the Storage Release for the
other storage.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat Oct 04 12:07:01 2008
Subject: CPOOL Delete vs. STORAGE RELEASE using SP=
If I build a cell pool in subpool #1, does a STORAGE RELEASE
specifying only SP=1 get rid of the cell pool as well as all other
allocated storage in sub pool #1, or do I have to CPOOL DELETE the
cell pool as well?
You should do a CPOOL DELETE.
The release of SP 1 would free the PXT and the cell storage
for any primary and secondary extents, but it would not free the
PPD or any SPDs, which are located in LSQA.
Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
