On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:35:57 -0500, Mike Feeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>WOW!! That doc APAR is 10 years old. I would have thought that this would >no longer be an issue by now. Especially with IBM's push to large sysplex >environments for software cost reductions, but I'll take that up with our IBM >representative. All LPARs in our sysplex execute from a copy of a common >cloned SYSRES, therefore all LPARs are z/OS 1.8 at the same maintenance >level. > >Is there a document (I can reference) that says that this mixed security >environment is not supported, so that I can show my management? > Being sarcastic, i would say the document proving it is not supported is the monthly software bill. In a mixed security environment SYSPLEX, RACF is charged for all lpars, even for the one you run another security product. To continue with "sarcasm' mode on, it is one of the rare moment where I learned something technical from the billing department. In any case, it is definitely an incentive to quickly migrate to one single product for the whole SYSPLEX. Bruno Sugliani zxnetconsult(at)free(dot)fr http://zxnetconsult.free.fr ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
