> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruno Sugliani
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:35:57 -0500, Mike Feeley wrote:
>
> >WOW!! That doc APAR is 10 years old. I would have thought that this
would
> >no longer be an issue by now. Especially with IBM's push to large
sysplex
> >environments for software cost reductions, but I'll take that up with
our IBM
> >representative. All LPARs in our sysplex execute from a copy of a
common
> >cloned SYSRES, therefore all LPARs are z/OS 1.8 at the same
maintenance
> >level.
> >
> >Is there a document (I can reference) that says that this mixed
security
> >environment is not supported, so that I can show my management?
> >
> Being sarcastic, i would say the document proving it is not supported
is the
> monthly software bill.
> In a mixed security environment SYSPLEX, RACF is charged for all
lpars, even
> for the one you run another security product.
We've noticed the same for the COBOL compiler. We do not run the
compiler on the Production lpar at all, but it's "installed" there "just
in case".
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
