On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:01:50 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Indeed.  I've been led to believe that it is physically impossible to
>drive a Windows system at a sustained rate equivalent to a mainframe
>while achieving equivalent throughput.
>
>    -jc-

That is what I have been told also. However, they do state:

<quote>
Obtain performance figures for the same application, and its Web enablement
equivalents, in the Windows Server environment. We drove the Windows
Server–based system to between 84-percent utilization and 97-percent
utilization, which was sufficient to roughly parallel the mainframe
performance (and gave an advantage to the mainframe in the energy comparison, so
that our comparison would be on the conservative side).
</quote>

--
John

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to