> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Walt Farrell
>
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:07:48 -0500, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Obviously I was wrong in asserting that the publications are correct
with
> >respect to the sentence
> >
> >
> >During unallocation (when LLA is stopped or the system is reIPLed),
the
> >system recatalogs the library data sets to the volume that was
current at
> >LLA initialization.
> >
> >Clearly there is no recataloging when "the system is reIPLed". And
there is
> >no recataloging when LLA is stopped. LLA uses what is in the catalog
when
> >it was initialized. That is why stopping and restarting LLA lets LLA
use a
> >newly cataloged (or a recataloged) data set.
>
> I suspect that there is (unbeknown to you) recataloging happening when
LLA
> is stopped.
If that were true, then how does indirect cataloging succeed? The vast
majority of our linklisted datasets are indirectly cataloged, with
copies residing on "primary", "alternate" and "maintenance" SYSRES sets.
Which set to IPL is specified in IEASYMxx, and which IEASYMxx to use is
in the IPL loadparm.
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
