On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:35:13 -0800, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I guess, as long as the "rule" holds true that higher CF levels nearly >always require the same or more storage, a "lazy" sysprog can't go wrong >using the values provided by CFSIZER, so long as s/he doesn't run out of >storage. In a short-on-storage situation, closer scrutiny would be >advisable. Dunno about "lazy," but simple economics do play...what's cheaper: Spending a few grand on some memory or wasting perfectly good sysprog cycles rearranging the deck chairs on the good ship Coupling Facility? Scott Fagen Enterprise Systems Management ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
