Scott Fagen wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:35:13 -0800, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess, as long as the "rule" holds true that higher CF levels nearly
always require the same or more storage, a "lazy" sysprog can't go wrong
using the values provided by CFSIZER, so long as s/he doesn't run out of
storage. In a short-on-storage situation, closer scrutiny would be
advisable.
Dunno about "lazy," but simple economics do play...what's cheaper: Spending
a few grand on some memory or wasting perfectly good sysprog cycles
rearranging the deck chairs on the good ship Coupling Facility?
I agree. And, for the record, I consider myself to be a "lazy" sysprog.
I have better things to do than micro-manage system configurations. I
over-allocate everything. To that end, our default region size is 256MB
and default MEMLIMIT is 2G!
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
