In <4a25f3adc7d4cd4388704e36280459c3090ed...@mddp-exch-003.aeth.aetna.com>, on 12/17/2008 at 12:40 PM, "Veilleux, Jon L" <veilleu...@aetna.com> said:
>>From a purely maintenance view, it seems to me that staying with FB 80 >would be easier than trying to page right and left through a VB 255 file >in an ISPF edit session. But not as easy as running a 160-wide ISPF session and not having to page right and left. I see no excuse for restricting users to 80-wide in this day and age, nor have I for decades. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html