Thanks, Bruce, for your answer. /ptd
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Bruce Richardson < [email protected]> wrote: > Unless you can really spread the workload across the 5 engines, I would go > with the 3 engine machine to be able to satisfy the largest single > workload, > the production CICS LPAR. > > On the other hand, you could build a compelling case for holding back > resources; put the production system on the 5 engine machine, for now, and > at some point down the road switch to the 3 engine machine to get a > performance boast. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
