On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 09:56 -0800, John Mattson wrote: > It "would" be easier to > control this by Masking job names... but that would require cooperation of > the applications group, and advance knowledge of which jobs are going to > fall on the critical path. Either Shane has their love, or a cattle prod.
Most people who know me will be able to answer that one. The answer to your problem(s) is SLAs - get them agreed to be the powers that be, and then you can codify what you need. As Ted (?) said, you're reacting to the symptom(s), not the underlying problem(s). Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
