>I don't want them FREEing and reallocating SYSPROC/SYSEXEC to concatenate their own stuff ahead of what we want them to use.
Why? Sounds a little like 'Big Brother' to me. I mean, it's your shop, but why not allow them a little flexibility? Whenever somebody has reported a problem with any ISPF construct, we've always asked the first question: "Are you using only the standard concatenations"? If the answer was "Yes", we'd look into it (including verifying that it was the standard). If the answer was "No", then we'd tell them to try it with only the standard libraries. If it recurred, then we'd look into it. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
