Yogs,
First thing I would stress is that there is no such thing as Omegamon. There
are three distinct-but-related product FAMILIES:
Omegamon (classic)
Omegamon II
Omegamon XE
Second thing I would stress is the need for a flexible, uniform, integrated set
of monitors. Each software package has its better and worse points, which I
would be glad to discuss individually if you're interested. IMHO,
feature-by-feature comparisons are less important than the total solution. It
depends on how the performance analyst's role is defined in your organization.
db
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Yogeetha balasubramanian
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 8:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: TMON with OMEGAMON Comparison
Hello there !!
We are moving from TMON to OMEGAMON . Can someone tell me the difference from
your experience between TMON and OMEGAMON that need to be considered ?
We are collecting this information
Which do you think is a better option. I felt OMEGAMON/CICS got a user
friendly interface.
Regards
Yogs
CICS Systems Programmer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
[email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
