On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:14:41 GMT "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
:>Is this technique actually doable ? :>And if so what considerations are required ? :>If I copy the DCB/DCBE to a Getmained Area that is below the line and in a COMMON subpool, could a PUT request be issued from other programs in other address spaces ? :>(i.e. Not the Address Space that issued the GETMAIN AND OPEN) :>The address of the DCB/DCBE in COMMON Storage would be placed in a NAME TOKEN PAIR after the DCB was Opened. :>Other Programs in other Address Spaces could retrieve the Name Token Pair and subsequently the DCB address and issue a PUT Request. :>The thought being that all I/O from the satelite address spaces would be directed to a physical dataset residing in the Address Space that owns (opened) the DCB. :>There are other techniques that accomlish the same thing but thats not the issue here. I am specifically asking about issuing PUT requests for a DCB/DCBE in Common Storage. :>Has anyone ever tried to accomplish this. PUT should fail, as I would expect that the access method issues a DEBCHK. Even EXCP should fail. Now, if you are using STARTIO you don't need to deal with no stinking DCB. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
