On Fri, 1 May 2009 14:11:26 -0700 (PDT), in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>We are belatedly beginning for the third time, an Cobol II to >Enterprise Cobol batch conversion and are encountering problems with >linking above the line, Cobol programs that call assembler >subroutines. The solution being proposed is to continue to call the >assembler routines statically, and link the ECBL programs below the >line. This requires the least amount of recoding. What do these assembler routines do? Can they be easily replaced by COBOL code given the capabilities of Enterprise COBOL? How hard would it be to convert the assembler programs to 31 bit? > >Are we losing anything important in implementing this solution? >What do we need to do to get this above the line? >Anything else we should be worrying about? > >Leslie Wagner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
