Check out www.basicassemblylanguage.com > Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 17:24:21 -0300 > From: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Assembler and ECBL conversion issues > To: [email protected] > > On Fri, 1 May 2009 14:11:26 -0700 (PDT), in bit.listserv.ibm-main you > wrote: > > >We are belatedly beginning for the third time, an Cobol II to > >Enterprise Cobol batch conversion and are encountering problems with > >linking above the line, Cobol programs that call assembler > >subroutines. The solution being proposed is to continue to call the > >assembler routines statically, and link the ECBL programs below the > >line. This requires the least amount of recoding. > > What do these assembler routines do? Can they be easily replaced by > COBOL code given the capabilities of Enterprise COBOL? How hard would > it be to convert the assembler programs to 31 bit? > > > >Are we losing anything important in implementing this solution? > >What do we need to do to get this above the line? > >Anything else we should be worrying about? > > > >Leslie Wagner > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
