On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:19:20 -0500 Mark Zelden <[email protected]> wrote:
:>On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:33:52 +0300, Binyamin Dissen :><[email protected]> wrote: :>>On Thu, 14 May 2009 10:44:38 -0500 Mark Zelden <[email protected]> :>>wrote: :>>:>On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:19:19 +0300, Binyamin Dissen :>>:><[email protected]> wrote: :>>:>>Silly me. I can't think of a reason why IBM would survey this except to :>remove :>>:>>them (except for IKJEFLD which is no longer needed IMHO). :>>:>One of our small systems that runs ACF2 uses it. It gets linked with ACF2's :>>:>IKJEFLD1 (which means ACF2 uses it also). There is a lot of home grown :>>:>accounting / uads stuff tied around the whole thing. Is it all valid in :>>:>2009? Could it all be replaced or torn out? Who knows... There are 10 :>>:>functions documented in the source. :>>IKJEFLD <> IKJEFLD1 :>True. Thanks for the correction / clarification. ACF2 does use IKJEFLD. Still? That is a bit of a maintenance nightmare. Wonder why they have not switched to IKJEFLD1. Back in Ye Olde Days I had a usermod to IKJEFLA(?) which changed the SYNCH to a BALR. Very much a pain to get control only in problem state. No idea why IBM thought IKJEFLD needed to be protected. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
