On Thu, 14 May 2009 10:44:38 -0500 Mark Zelden <[email protected]> wrote:
:>On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:19:19 +0300, Binyamin Dissen :><[email protected]> wrote: :>>Silly me. I can't think of a reason why IBM would survey this except to remove :>>them (except for IKJEFLD which is no longer needed IMHO). :>One of our small systems that runs ACF2 uses it. It gets linked with ACF2's :>IKJEFLD1 (which means ACF2 uses it also). There is a lot of home grown :>accounting / uads stuff tied around the whole thing. Is it all valid in :>2009? Could it all be replaced or torn out? Who knows... There are 10 :>functions documented in the source. IKJEFLD <> IKJEFLD1 -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
