On 15 May 2009 18:08:22 -0700, [email protected] (Clark Morris) wrote:
>I checked the reference you gave and for QSAM files, if the BLOCK >CONTAINS clause is omitted, BLOCK 1 RECORD is assumed. This stupidity >has aggravated me for years. The whole idea of (IBM mainframe) CoBOL still caring about blocksize is irritating. The "fix" of making BLOCK CONTAINS 0 is IMHO, not the way fixes should be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
