Ted MacNEIL wrote: >I have never trusted that exit/run-time report. >When I want to check out CPU times for jobs, I always go for the >appropriate SMF records (usually TYPE30 -- Job/Step Accounting: >depending on sub-type).
>Do you have the appropriate tools to analyse SMF records? Not really -- or at least, not the skills to do so. I do recognize the value of having "real" tools, so maybe I'll have to go that route. But (and this is a straight question, I'm not arguing!) surely if the values in standard job output are wrong, they might have been corrected sometime in the last 45 years of OS? That just seems unlikely. ...phsiii ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
