On Fri, 22 May 2009 13:36:07 -0400, Phil Smith III <[email protected]> wrote:
>The following is typical output found in the SYSMSG produced by a batch job on our z/OS 1.9 system: > -STEPNAME PROCSTEP RC EXCP CONN TCB SRB CLOCK SERV > -NNN1SW 00 2326 1195 200.44 .00 .9 3094K > -NNN1HW 00 2316 1069 .64 .00 .0 9753 > >The following are the step termination message produced for those steps: > /START 2009139.1224 > /STOP 2009139.1225 CPU 0MIN 46.98SEC SRB 0MIN 00.03SEC > > /START 2009139.1225 > /STOP 2009139.1225 CPU 0MIN 00.15SEC SRB 0MIN 00.01SEC > >We are not able to reconcile the step TCB time, particularly in the first step, with the actual run/clock time of that step. In fact, the TCB time attributed to the first step is considerably greater than the job's entire wall-clock run time. > >The ratios match -- 200.44/.64 ~= 46.98/.15 -- but what units is the "200.44" in? What is the TCB time showing us? > It's showing you that you have a bad IEFACTRT SMF exit. :-) Compare what you are seeing to the "real" SMF30 records (which I hope you offload / keep). IEFACTRT gets it data from those records. Try a current sample from SYS1.SAMPLIB(SMFEXITS), SYS1.SAMPLIB(IEEACTRT) or from the CBT. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[email protected] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
