I don't have the HOLD data in front of me, but as I recall 'exit removal' referred only to message suppression logic, not to the exit per se. For example, we use the exit to set message color by system, not for suppression. The exit is still in place and working fine. I think the HOLD record is poorly worded and misleading, but the gist is there if you ponder it long enough.
. . JO.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile [email protected] "Klein, Kenneth" <kenneth.kl...@ky FB.COM> To Sent by: IBM [email protected] Mainframe cc Discussion List <[email protected] Subject .edu> Message Flood Automation in z/os 1.9 07/01/2009 09:44 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected] .edu> The hold(action) states the userexit is to be removed from the mpflst, and in consolxx the uexit be set to (N). So how does the integrated mfa know which messages to suppress? Any other actions required beyond whats in the hold data? Ken Klein Sr. Systems Programmer Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance - Louisville ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
