On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:46:47 -0500, Jochen Roehrig <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hello, > >is LLA STC required to benefit from VLF's CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC)? >We think about running our system with no LLA STC, because we use some ISV's >solution instead of LLA. But my first tests with VLF CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC) and >no LLA up an running fail. Means: it looks like that VLF does not cache >members from IKJEXEC EDSN definitions. Any prerequisites required to benefit >from VLF CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC)? > It's documented that the operation of LLA is not dependent on VLF (although it can benefit from VLF by using the CSVLLA class), but the opposite isn't documented. So if starting LLA is required for VLF to work at all, this is the first I've heard of it. But I'm pretty sure at shops I've been at that ran something like PMO/Quickfetch still ran LLA also. Do you have any other classes defined that you can check? What about IGGCAS (catalog) or any of the RACF classes. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[email protected] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
