On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:46:47 -0500, Jochen Roehrig <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hello, > >is LLA STC required to benefit from VLF's CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC)? >We think about running our system with no LLA STC, because we use some ISV's >solution instead of LLA. But my first tests with VLF CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC) and >no LLA up an running fail. Means: it looks like that VLF does not cache >members from IKJEXEC EDSN definitions. Any prerequisites required to benefit >from VLF CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC)? > >Thanks in advance, >Jochen > LLA is written to use the interface to VLF. Any APF program can use VLF to cache "whatever" by executing the correct COFxxx macro. So, I would say that your LLA replacement product does not attempt to interface to VLF, or you have not set up VLF properly to allow caching. I would bet the former (VLF interface does not exist). http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A890/12.0 -- John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
