In <m3pq8zm8q3....@garlic.com>, on 06/16/2012
at 02:07 PM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler <l...@garlic.com> said:
>note that CICS was originally to avoid having to use as few
>os/360 resources as possible ... because os/360 processing was
>horrendously heavy weight and bloated.
Was that the reason, or was it because PCP and MFT[1] did not have
ATTACH?
[1] MFT eventually got ATTACH, but that came later.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
