On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:34:27 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >[1] MFT eventually got ATTACH, but that came later. > ??? How could that possibly work?
Doesn't "MFT" stand for "Multiprogramming with a Fixed number of Tasks"? The instant one does an ATTACH, doesn't the number of tasks change? (Or did MFT simulate ATTACH by dispatching an idle member of the fixed task pool?) --gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
