In <ecj4u7dd2vt0gv0t30od9a27mqmbivg...@4ax.com>, on 06/20/2012
at 07:29 PM, Clark Morris <cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca> said:
>Would you think better of Crovitz if his quoting VINTON Cerf was
>transformed by me to his quoting VINCENT Cerf?
No, because the error I commented on was in the original article. The
World Wide Web is not the Internet.
>Agreed but the question still remains as to whether there should be
>concerns about reputed proposals for the ITU to be more involved
>with the Internet.
The Devil is in the details. There's nothing wrong with the ITU being
involved with developing standards, but it should certainly not be
involved in enforcing local political prejudices. The censorship
proposals would be equally bad if they came from, e.g., ICANN, IETF,
W3C.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
