On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 07:12:59 -0500, Barbara Nitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>At the zOS 1.12 level, do we still have to calculate the spin failure >>detection interval for EXSPATxx? If not, what is the current best practice? > >As far as I know, best practise is to take whatever default IBM currently >takes. We removed exspat ages ago from all parmlibs and take the defaults. >That also means that the SFM intervals get computed automatically and can be >displayed with a D XCF command. > >I believe there is an XCF health check that tells you you did right if you >didn't specify anything. > >Barbara Nitz > What's this? Do my eyes deceive me? Barbara singing the praises of a health check - any health check? :-) (just kidding!!) -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:[email protected] Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
