John Gilmore wrote: >In its standard use the word 'asynchronous' and the behavior he >describes are incompatible. Did he perhaps mean 'synchronous' >instead?
>Or is he using the word 'asynchronous' in a private, arcane sense? If >so, he needs to explain that very special sense. I took it to mean "asynchronous to the CP". You're of course correct that it's pretty darned synchronous to the app! ...phsiii ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
