Mr. Gilmore,

Please do continue to demonstrate precise language with correct usage, if 
for no other reason than to show the rest of us how it should be done. You 
set a high standard, sir.  Please forgive us for not being quite able to 
live up to it.

Tom

Vacation Notice: 
   8/10 - 8/26/2012 

Tom Puddicombe
Mainframe Performance & Capacity Planning
CSC

31 Brookdale Rd, Meriden, CT 06450
ITIS | (860) 428-3252 | [email protected] | www.csc.com

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in 
delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to 
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement 
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such 
purpose.



From:   John Gilmore <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]
Date:   07/26/2012 01:58 PM
Subject:        Re: Gordon Crovitz: Who Really Invented the Internet?
Sent by:        IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>



I also grow weary of complaints about my notionally 'exotic'
vocabulary.  This term once had a precise meaning.  (Signage annoucing
efforts at 'exotic plant control' in Hawaii's state and national parks
preserve it.)  Its subliterate use has converted it into a vague
synonym for strange or non-standard.

In fact I see no reason to censor my vocabulary, using a small proper
subset of it notionally appropriate to conversations with an impaired
child here.  That would patronize readers of my posts to no good end.
(Those who do not wish to read these posts need not do so.)

John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA

On 7/26/12, David Stokes <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just as I had begun to feel some sympathy for David Stokes, he
>> managed to dissipate it at a stroke.
>
> Damn it, if only I'd known.
>
> To the rest I've no real idea what you are talking about (not because of 
the
> exotic vocabulary). I think you've gone off at rather a tangent from the
> points I was making and I tend anyway to simply turn off when I hear the
> words "conspiracy theory". However in a subtle and unexpected sort of 
way
> you are just maybe confirming what I was in fact saying. The Internet
> involves a vast range of different interests and agendas. That's why I
> suggested one should explain clearly what one means when referring to 
issues
> such as alleged "abuse". That was pretty much it really, other than the
> rather pointless discussions about how it would all have been better 
with or
> without...
>
> BTW, thanks guys for the surprising number of more positive of-list
> communications.
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] Im
> Auftrag von John Gilmore
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2012 14:45
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: Gordon Crovitz: Who Really Invented the Internet?
>
> Just as I had begun  to feel some sympathy for David Stokes, he
> managed to dissipate it at a stroke.
>
> Just what does
>
> <begin extract>
> The question was not which exact organisation decides such things, but
> rather whose particular political orientation will be asserting itself
> in such decisions, and how will they be implemented in practice.
> </end extract>
>
> mean operationally?
>
> In another context Paul Krugman recently reminded us that conspiracy
> theories are dispensable, likely to be misleading, in  the many
> situations in which stupidity provides an adequate explanation of what
> is going on.
>
> Whatever else the Internet may be, its evolution reflects a congeries
> of diverse, finally irreconcilable ideologies and business interests;
> and no simple dietrologia is likely to be very helpful in explaining
> it.
>
> These things said, Mr Stokes HAS been the target of too much ad
> hominem criticism.
>
> John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to