I love that term hysterically grown. I have been there also. We develop Identity Management software and some of it was hastily put together. But RACF,ACF2 and Top-Secret are a tad different than Netview and MPF. Did a lot of MPF in a past life also.
Everyone has their methods for preventing message flooding Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Aug 9, 2012, at 1:16 AM, ibmmain <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just curious you don't use dsitbl01 anymore or am I dating myself .....lol > > No idea since I don't 'do' NetView. I guess this is because there are two > NetViews per system, one system automation netview and one networks netview. > MPF is set to AUTO(YES) for everything. And I also guess that this was done > specifically (ages ago) for command responses to commands issued from the > networks netview (note that the console names start with an 'N' - networks > netview) to prevent lengthy replies to (vtam?) commands from cluttering up > syslog and (automation) netlog. > > I basically inherited most of the MPFEXIT code and have combined the crucial > instructions from several into the sample I provided. In essence, things were > 'hysterically grown' :-) > > Barbara > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
