Since the tape is bad, why would you want to keep it? :>: -----Original Message----- :>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On :>: Behalf Of willie bunter :>: Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:29 PM :>: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :>: Subject: Re: QUESTION ON HSM ; BYPASSING DSNS ON A ML2 TAPE :>: :>: By using FORCE would I lose the tape? I remember once before I did that :>: and I think it got deleted from HSM. :>: :>: :>: :>: ________________________________ :>: From: "Staller, Allan" <allan.stal...@kbmg.com> :>: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :>: Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 1:10 PM :>: Subject: Re: QUESTION ON HSM ; BYPASSING DSNS ON A ML2 TAPE :>: :>: :>: HSEND RECYCLE EXECUTE VOL(xxxxxx) FORCE ? What you have described is :>: usually successful. :>: :>: You might also recall the datasets past the damaged point individually. :>: When all have been recalled HSEND RECYCLE EXECUTE VOLUME(xxxxxx) FORCE :>: This tape should then free up without a mount. :>: :>: HTH, :>: :>: <snip> :>: I am trying to recycle a damaged ML2 tape. The RECYCLE rolls along :>: however when it hits a particular dsn the recycle terminates. I deleted :>: the migrated dsn (ML2) so as to bypass the problem however it doesn't :>: work. Is there a way of having the RECYCLE bypass this troublesome :>: dsn on the ML2 tape? :>: </snip>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
