Forget the part about STEP level ENQ. All ENQs are done by the CONSOLE address 
space, and so STEP is not relevant.

-- 
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets®

9151 Boulevard 26 • N. Richland Hills • TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone •
[email protected] • www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets® is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. –The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company®, Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA 
Life and Health Insurance Company.SM


> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of McKown, John
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:41 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Console LOGON and SYSPLEX
> 
> I did a command that I have which lists ENQ information. I found an
> entry like:
> 
> Qname=SYSZCNZ
> Rname=USERID#????????|consname|
> Jobname=CONSOLE (which was the name of the z/OS SMCS console the user
> was logged on to)
> Type=EXCL (Exclusive)
> Status=OWNED
> Scope=SYSPLEX
> 
> Where the ??????? is 8 character RACF id (padded with blanks if
> necessary) and the "consname" is the name of the console.
> 
> This certainly looks like it could be the ENQ done by console support.
> You could change the scope from SYSPLEX to SYSTEM via the GRS RNL, or
> even to STEP to allow the same user onto multiple consoles on a single
> system image. However, I wonder if this is wise. I don't know why the
> scope is SYSPLEX and not SYSTEM or even why it is issued. It may be
> that the USERID logged on my be used in other parts of the system and
> is assumed to be unique within the SYSPLEX. If so, who knows what would
> happen if you change this ENQ?
> 
> from SG247605, section 27.1.1
> <quote>
> The new console data structures no longer require sysplex-wide
> serialization to make most updates. The system on which a console is
> active owns the data, and will hold ENQ SYSZCNZ CONNAME#consname. The
> other systems may not display the newest data.
> </quote>
> 
> So, there may be data structures in the CONSOLE address space which are
> dependent on this ENQ be SYSPLEX-wide. Or, perhaps, it is a way for
> z/OS to "know" which system is actually controlling a specific console.
> I'm a bit confused by this because, in a SYSPLEX, the console names
> must be unique. And the ENQ for the USERID#... has the console id in
> it. So why does console to a "generic" ENQ search, ignoring the console
> name. In the words of Vinnie Babarino: "I'm so confused!" (John
> Travolta in "Welcome Back Kotter").
> 
> --
> John McKown
> Systems Engineer IV
> IT
> 
> Administrative Services Group
> 
> HealthMarkets®
> 
> 9151 Boulevard 26 • N. Richland Hills • TX 76010
> (817) 255-3225 phone •
> [email protected] • www.HealthMarkets.com
> 
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or
> proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
> original message. HealthMarkets® is the brand name for products
> underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets,
> Inc. –The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company®, Mid-West National Life
> Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance
> Company.SM
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of Juan Mautalen
> > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 11:46 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Console LOGON and SYSPLEX
> >
> > Hi:
> >
> > We have 2 Lpars in sysplex (z/OS 1.11), say LparA and LparB. Consoles
> > are configured with LOGON(OPTIONAL) on both systems. Each system has
> > its own RACF database.
> >
> > If an operator is already logoned to an LparA console and tries to
> > logon to an LparB console, then logon fails with the following
> message:
> >
> > CNZ0005I LOGON REJECTED. REASON=USERID ABC123 IN USE ON SYSTEM SYSA
> > CONSOLE MSTRSYSA
> >
> > Is this normal behaviour?
> > Is there any configuration change that can be made to allow the same
> > operator to logon to consoles on both systems at the same time?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your help,
> >
> > JUAN MAUTALEN
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-
> MAIN
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to