I don't see how this ever worked.   At least the version I have (but never 
used).  
I have version 1.6.0 from 14/01/2004.   Maybe Alastair broke it then but to me
it looks like it must have been broken since a compare function was added.  

Anyway, I think a simple fix for non compare processing is to add this one
line of code that has "MSZ" in the comments:


If (process = 'RCNVTCAT') Then       /* Process as RCNVTCAT           */ 
 Do                                  /*                               */ 
  cat=cat.1     /* added by MSZ */                                       
  count.id = 0                       /* initialise count              */ 


I still use MCNVTCAT when I need it (which has been a long time). 

Regards,

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS       
mailto:[email protected]                                        
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html 
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/



On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:58:56 -0700, Lizette Koehler <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>So have you tried contacting the creator of the RCNVTCAT process?  Perhaps 
>they need to make a code change.
>
>From the prolog
>
>/* Author : Alastair Gray - [email protected]                      */
>/*                 (or the e-mail I use to post on TSO-REXX/IBM-MAIN) */
>/*
>
>
>
>Lizette
>
>
>>
>>Correction, just in case someone was still mulling over their response to my 
>>original question:
>>
>>I have some copies of output PDS's ran under z/OS *1.4* and they have the 
>>proper catalog name.   Our previous upgrade was 1.4->1.11
>>
>>Regards
>>Dana
>>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to