Wowwwwwwwww John. This really matters to you, doesn't it...
I guess in the future, I'll have to try to be
less... I don't know... desperate?
Anyway (and I'll give you credit for this), I've
decided to discontinue using PoOps. (You're
right, it stinks.) Instead, I'm going to try out
"zProOps" (In honor of zGreg???) I know it's
getting a bit long for a "zshortcut", but whatever. It appeals to me.
[;)]
Dave
At 9/18/2012 04:52 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
I don't find the argument that the terminal 's'
in 'PoOps' represents the plural terminus of
'Principles' at all persuasive. It seems to me
to be a desperate expedient to justify the indefensible.
My reasons for preferring 'PrOp' are three: 1)
it is innocuously pronounceable; 2) it is devoid
of the vaguely scatological connotations of its
competitors; and 3) it is less clumsy than they.
Finally, of course: À chacun son goût!
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Dave Cole REPLY TO: [email protected]
ColeSoft Marketing WEB PAGE: http://www.colesoft.com
736 Fox Hollow Road VOICE: 540-456-8536
Afton, VA 22920 FAX: 540-456-6658
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
