In
<cae1xxdgv26sbufjf9juia7ycx2q35u+sdm_8vxscfpgc75w...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 09/18/2012
at 04:52 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>My reasons for preferring 'PrOp' are three: 1) it is innocuously
>pronounceable; 2) it is devoid of the vaguely scatological
>connotations of its competitors; and 3) it is less clumsy than
>they.
Why not ProOps?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
