>Or, if you find DF-Sort inadequate, you could write your own sort utility.
You've gotta be kidding, aren't you? Anyway, thanks for your confidence in my
abilities, but you're overestimating me (not sure this if the correct
translation).
The only thing I'd wish DF-Sort would is to work as the manual promises:
DYNALLOC=(d,n)
...
n specifies the *maximum* number of requested work data sets.
This is not correct. I learnt here today that this is the *fix* number of
dynamically allocated work data sets. I was hoping DF-Sort would calculate an
optimal number of data sets lower or equal to n. I guess I'm gonna send an RCF.
--
Peter Hunkeler
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
