>Seeing that the message is quite misleading, yes it may deserve >opening an APAR. I didn't think about it really. I have never opened >an APAR before, but my boss won't be in the mood of my getting into >the process of creating one. There's always work to be done, and I >must not "waste time". I just obey (this doesn't mean IBM does not >deserve getting warned about this to correct the manual).
I perfectly understand your situation, however, you did waste a lot of time just because the message was so misleading... It would be an APAR against the code not the manual. syslogd should differentiate between the different reasons why it cannot proceed. At least one additional (different) message would be appropriate. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
