I completely agree, Peter. Thanks for your understanding. Aitor. On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) <[email protected]> wrote: >>Seeing that the message is quite misleading, yes it may deserve >>opening an APAR. I didn't think about it really. I have never opened >>an APAR before, but my boss won't be in the mood of my getting into >>the process of creating one. There's always work to be done, and I >>must not "waste time". I just obey (this doesn't mean IBM does not >>deserve getting warned about this to correct the manual). > > I perfectly understand your situation, however, you did waste a lot of > time just because the message was so misleading... > > It would be an APAR against the code not the manual. syslogd should > differentiate between the different reasons why it cannot proceed. At > least one additional (different) message would be appropriate. > > -- > Peter Hunkeler > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
