On Oct 10, 2012, at 8:12 AM, CAPRON Romain <[email protected]> wrote:
> We want to minimize the number different geometry for our dasd. We're asking > if it's reasonable to only use mod54 dasd. > More and more people say that with modern dasd storage, it's no more usefull > to work with 3390-9 and 3390-27... > All of your dasd are pprc"ed" That's what I've done; all z/OS volumes are 3390-54. (I still have a few z/VM volumes that are 3390-9.) This does mean that some volumes are mostly empty, but I'm getting ready to implement dynamic provisioning on our storage system so even that won't be a concern. -- Curtis Pew ([email protected]) ITS Systems Core The University of Texas at Austin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
