>>John Gilmore <[email protected]> said: >>It would not be unfair, I think, to characterize Shmuel's posts as a >>mixture of gratuitous contention and redeeming technical information.
>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz said: >It would not be unfair to characterize your posts as falsely attributing >malicious intent to statements that you don't understand, and not just mine >either. Shmuel, you often attribute malicious intent to other posters when you call them hypocritical. You did that with a statement of mine seven years ago when I repeatedly asked you why you were not answering a technical question I kept asking you. You finally said that you thought I was being hypocritical. I believe your reply to Mr. Gilmore is therefore hypocritical. I also believe it possible for someone to be gratuitously contentious and not perceive any malicious intent in himself. Bill Fairchild ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
