The COBOL Performance Tuning paper talks about the performance differences of
using EXEC CICS LINK vs COBOL dynamic CALL. Perhaps this will be helpful to
you. You can find the performance tuning paper on the COBOL page at:
http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/cobol/library/ (scroll down near the
bottom of the page). The most current one is Enterprise COBOL Version 4 Release
2 Performance Tuning (which is at the top of the list). The CICS section starts
on page 27.
Rick Arellanes
IBM COBOL Development and Performance
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:21:59 +0000, John Weber <j...@fiteq.com> wrote:
>We have a COBOL CICS module being called using the LINK command.
>
>Here is the interface call:
>
>EXEC CICS
> LINK PROGRAM('PROGRAM1')
> RESP(WS-RESP)
> COMMAREA(WS-COMMAREA)
>END-EXEC
>
>However, it has been brought up that creating a bound module instead of using
>LINK can speed up response time.
>
>Is this binding compiler in question CTRCOBMOD? If so, is this worth pursuing?
>
>Thanks a lot...
>
>John
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
